Existing operation
Evaluate a process within an active facility: current workflow, constraints, product quality, and integration needs.
Applications & validation
One system. Different operating models.
NanoCure works with cannabis and hemp operators to match the proposed post-harvest process to their facility, product, scale, and quality requirements—from craft operations to industrial programs.
Expansion or new build
Define requirements before the future process is fixed: batch needs, room layout, utilities, and installation scope.
Multi-site program
Establish a common framework across locations for standards, quality review, governance, and sequencing.
Potential benefits
Less loss. Faster cycles. Product quality in view.
The business case depends on the material, treatment configuration, facility, and evidence. These are the benefits we work with each operator to evaluate.
- Reactive species are used to target mold spores, viruses, yeast, and bacteria; microbial and mycotoxin goals need process-specific validation.
- Explore more efficient drying and curing for faster turnaround from harvest to sale.
- Reduce post-harvest loss from microbial contamination and protect usable yield.
- Keep terpene, trichome, cannabinoid, flavor, and appearance preservation in the quality plan.
- Consider labor, space, and operating costs alongside throughput and quality.
- A non-thermal approach without added harsh chemicals or radiation.
- Discuss rental or purchase directly with US-based NanoGuard representatives, without brokers.
- A rental path may avoid an upfront equipment purchase, subject to availability and terms.
- Review enclosed-unit operation, self-cleaning capabilities, and maintenance for the configuration.
Direct commercial path
Rent or buy directly from NanoGuard.
Speak with US-based representatives about a configured unit, installation, support, and rental or purchase terms. A rental option may remove the need for an upfront equipment purchase; availability and terms are confirmed for each project.
Validation & documentation
Define. Review. Document.
Technical, operational, and documentation questions should be addressed for the intended material, configuration, operating conditions, and jurisdiction. Do not assume a universal outcome.
Define the evaluation
Confirm material, facility context, intended outcome, and acceptable quality measures.
Review the evidence
Identify treatment parameters, microbial results, product-quality data, and local requirements.
Document the decision
Record findings, limitations, open items, and the facility’s approval path.
Ask the team about a facility evaluation, a technology review, or validation and documentation for your intended use. Available materials and the appropriate review route are confirmed during the conversation.
Request a review